Paper detail

Similarity of symbol frequency distributions with heavy tails

Quantifying the similarity between symbolic sequences is a traditional problem in Information Theory which requires comparing the frequencies of symbols in different sequences. In numerous modern applications, ranging from DNA over music to texts, the distribution of symbol frequencies is characterized by heavy-tailed distributions (e.g., Zipf's law). The large number of low-frequency symbols in these distributions poses major difficulties to the estimation of the similarity between sequences, e.g., they hinder an accurate finite-size estimation of entropies. Here we show analytically how the systematic (bias) and statistical (fluctuations) errors in these estimations depend on the sample size~$N$ and on the exponent~$γ$ of the heavy-tailed distribution. Our results are valid for the Shannon entropy $(α=1)$, its corresponding similarity measures (e.g., the Jensen-Shanon divergence), and also for measures based on the generalized entropy of order $α$. For small $α$'s, including $α=1$, the errors decay slower than the $1/N$-decay observed in short-tailed distributions. For $α$ larger than a critical value $α^* = 1+1/γ\leq 2$, the $1/N$-decay is recovered. We show the practical significance of our results by quantifying the evolution of the English language over the last two centuries using a complete $α$-spectrum of measures. We find that frequent words change more slowly than less frequent words and that $α=2$ provides the most robust measure to quantify language change.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.