Paper detail

Similarity and delay between two non-narrow-band time signals

Correlation coefficient is usually used to measure the correlation degree between two time signals. However, its performance will drop or even fail if the signals are noised. Based on the time-frequency phase spectrum (TFPS) provided by normal time-frequency transform (NTFT), similarity coefficient is proposed to measure the similarity between two non-narrow-band time signals, even if the signals are noised. The basic idea of the similarity coefficient is to translate the interest part of signal f1(t)'s TFPS along the time axis to couple with signal f2(t)'s TFPS. Such coupling would generate a maximum if f1(t)and f2(t) are really similar to each other in time-frequency structure. The maximum, if normalized, is called similarity coefficient. The location of the maximum indicates the time delay between f1(t) and f2(t). Numerical results show that the similarity coefficient is better than the correlation coefficient in measuring the correlation degree between two noised signals. Precision and accuracy of the time delay estimation (TDE) based on the similarity analysis are much better than those based on cross-correlation (CC) method and generalized CC (GCC) method under low SNR.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.