Paper detail

Similar Shot Noise in Cyg X-1, GRO J0422+32 and 1E 1724-3045

We study the rapid variability in Cyg X-1 observed with the Rossi Timing Explorer (RXTE) on Jan 17 and 20 of 1997. The power spectra below 200 Hz can be characterized by two ``shot noise'' components and a peaked-noise centered at 0.2 Hz. This is similar to those ``shot noise'' observed in another black hole candidate GRO J0422+32 and a neutron star X-ray binary 1E 1724-3045. The similarity suggests that the generation mechanism of ``shot noise'' and peaked-noise is probably similar in both black hole systems and neutron star systems, and in both high mass X-ray binaries (HMXBS) and low mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs). We have also analyzed ~ 500 brightest shots selected from the Cyg X-1 light curves. The time scale of the spectral variation around the shot can be as long as ~ a few seconds, consistent with Ginga results. The difference between the superposed shot profile in different energy bands can be attributed to the time lag and the different shot width between different energy bands. The shot width defined from the auto-correlation function of shot profile does not show a bimodal distribution.

preprint1999arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.