Paper detail

Silverman's conjecture for additive polynomial mappings

Let $F : \mathrm{End}_{\mathbb{F_p}}(\mathbb{G}_{a/K}^d)$ be an additive polynomial mapping over a global function field $K/\mathbb{F}_q$, and let $P \in \mathbb{G}_a^d(K)$. Following Silverman, consider $δ:= \lim_{n \in \mathbb{N}} (°{F^{n}})^{1/n}$ the dynamic degree of $F$ and $α(P) := \limsup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} h_K(F^{n}P)^{1/n}$ the arithmetic degree of $F$ at $P$. We have $α(P) \leq δ$, and extending a conjecture of Silverman from the number field case, it is expected that equality holds if the orbit of $P$ is Zariski-dense. We prove a weaker form of this conjecture: if $δ> 1$ and the orbit of $P$ is Zariski-dense, then also $α(P) > 1$. We obtain furthermore a more precise result concerning the growth along the orbit of $P$ of the heights of the individual coordinates, and formulate a few related open problems motivated by our results, including a generalization "with moving targets" of Faltings's theorem back in the number field case.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.