Paper detail

Silver and palladium help unveil the nature of a second r-process

The rapid neutron-capture process, creating about half of the heaviest elements in the Solar System was believed to be unique. Many recent studies have shown that this does not include the formation of lighter elements (in particular 38 < Z < 48). Among those, palladium (Pd) and especially silver (Ag) are expected to be key indicators of a possible second r-process, but until recently they have been studied only in a few stars. Therefore we target Pd and Ag in a large sample of stars and compare these abundances to those of Sr, Y, Zr, Ba and Eu produced by the slow (s-) and rapid (r-) neutron-capture processes. Hereby we investigate the nature of the formation process of Ag and Pd. Through a homogeneous 1D LTE analysis of 71 stars we derive stellar abundances using the spectrum synthesis code MOOG, and MARCS model atmospheres. We calculate abundance ratio trends and compare the derived abundances to site-dependent yield predictions (low mass O-Ne-Mg cc SN, and parametrised high entropy winds), to extract characteristics of the second r-process. The abundance ratios of the heavy elements yield correlations and anti-correlations. These trends lead to clear indications of the existence of a second/weak r-process, responsible for the formation of Pd and Ag. By comparing to the model predictions, we find that the conditions under which this process takes place differ from the main r-process in needing lower neutron number densities, neutron-to-seed ratios, entropies and/or favour higher electron abundances. Our analysis confirms that Pd and Ag form via a r-process that differs from the main r-process, the main and weak s-processes, and charged particle freeze-outs. This process is efficiently working down to [Fe/H] = -3.3 (where our sample ends). Our results may indicate that a combination of these explosive sites is needed to explain the observationally-derived abundance patterns.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access10 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.