Paper detail

Silicate grain growth due to ion trapping in oxygen-rich supernova remnants like Cassiopeia A

Core-collapse supernovae can condense large masses of dust post-explosion. However, sputtering and grain-grain collisions during the subsequent passage of the dust through the reverse shock can potentially destroy a significant fraction of the newly formed dust before it can reach the interstellar medium. Here we show that in oxygen-rich supernova remnants like Cassiopeia A the penetration and trapping within silicate grains of the same impinging ions of oxygen, silicon and magnesium that are responsible for grain surface sputtering can significantly reduce the net loss of grain material. We model conditions representative of dusty clumps (density contrast $χ=100$) passing through the reverse shock in the oxygen-rich Cassiopeia A remnant and find that, compared to cases where the effect is neglected, as well as facilitating the formation of grains larger than those that had originally condensed, ion trapping increases the surviving masses of silicate dust by factors of up to two to four, depending on initial grain radii. For higher density contrasts ($χ\gtrsim180$), we find that the effect of gas accretion on the surface of dust grains surpasses ion trapping, and the survival rate increases to ${\sim}55 \%$ of the initial dust mass for $χ=256$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.