Paper detail

Significant foreground unrelated non-acoustic anisotropy on the one degree scale in WMAP 5-year observations

The spectral variation of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) as observed by WMAP was tested using foreground reduced WMAP5 data, by producing subtraction maps at the 1$^\circ$ angular resolution between the two cosmological bands of V and W, for masked sky areas that avoid the Galactic disk. The resulting $V-W$ map revealed a non-acoustic signal over and above the WMAP5 pixel noise, with two main properties. Firstly, it possesses quadrupole power at the $\approx$ 1 $μK$ level which may be attributed to foreground residuals. Second, it fluctuates also at all values of $\ell >$ 2, especially on the $1^\circ$ scale ($200 \lesssim \ell \lesssim 300$). The behavior is {\it random and symmetrical} about zero temperature with a r.m.s. amplitude of $\approx$ 7 $μK$, or 10 % of the maximum CMB anisotropy, which would require a `cosmic conspiracy' among the foreground components if it is a consequence of their existences. Both anomalies must be properly diagnosed and corrected if `precision cosmology' is the claim. The second anomaly is, however, more interesting because it opens the question on whether the CMB anisotropy genuinely represents primordial density seeds.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.