Paper detail

Signed fundamental domains for totally real number fields

We give a signed fundamental domain for the action on $\mathbb{R}^n_+$ of the totally positive units $E_+$ of a totally real number field $k$ of degree $n$. The domain $\big\{(C_σ,w_σ) \big\}_σ$ is signed since the net number of its intersections with any $E_+$-orbit is 1, i. e. for any $x\in \mathbb{R}^n_+$, $$ \sum_{σ\in S_{n-1}} \sum_{\varepsilon\in E_+} w_σχ^{\phantom{1}}_{C_σ}(\varepsilon x) = 1. $$ Here $χ_{C_σ}$ is the characteristic function of $C_σ$, $w_σ=\pm1$ is a natural orientation of the $n$-dimensional $k$-rational cone $C_σ\subset\mathbb{R}^n_+$, and the inner sum is actually finite. Signed fundamental domains are as useful as Shintani's true ones for the purpose of calculating abelian $L$-functions. They have the advantage of being easily constructed from any set of fundamental units, whereas in practice there is no algorithm producing Shintani's $k$-rational cones. Our proof uses algebraic topology on the quotient manifold $\mathbb{R}^n_+/E_+$. The invariance of the topological degree under homotopy allows us to control the deformation of a crooked fundamental domain into nice straight cones. Crossings may occur during the homotopy, leading to the need to subtract some cones.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.