Paper detail

Signatures of first galaxies at FIR/sub-mm wavelengths

We explore the possibility of detecting first galaxies with a generic far-infrared/sub-millimeter telescope by applying an analytical model of primordial dust emission. As shown in previous works, galaxies at redshifts $z>7$ experience a strong negative K-correction in such a way that systems of similar masses are brighter at higher $z$. In addition, at a given mass and $z$, our model predicts that luminosity fluxes increase proportionally to the dust-to-metal ratios ($D/M$) of primeval sources. We evaluate the observability of model sources at different $z>7$ as a function of the observed survey area ($ΔΩ$) and sensitivity ($S$) of a generic instrument. Assuming $ΔΩ\sim 10~{\rm deg}^2$ and a plausible $S \sim 1~μ{\rm Jy}$ for a near future survey, we could assure the detection of at least one typical source with $D/M \sim 5\times10^{-3}$ at $z>7$. For $S\gtrsim 1~μ{\rm Jy}$ and $ΔΩ\lesssim 10~{\rm deg}^2$, higher than typical $D/M$ are required to detect at least one individual source at $z>7$. The observability of model galaxies is also affected by the size distribution of dust grains, specially towards higher $z$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.