Paper detail

Signatures of clumpy dark matter in the global 21 cm background signal

We examine the extent to which the self-annihilation of supersymmetric neutralino dark matter, as well as light dark matter, influences the rate of heating, ionisation and Lyman-alpha pumping of interstellar hydrogen and helium and the extent to which this is manifested in the 21cm global background signal. We fully consider the enhancements to the annihilation rate from DM halos and substructures within them. We find that the influence of such structures can result in significant changes in the differential brightness temperature. The changes at redsfhits z<25 are likely to be undetectable due to the presence of the astrophysical signal; however, in the most favourable cases, deviations in the differential brightness temperature, relative to its value in the absence of self-annihilating DM, of up to ~20 mK at z=30 can occur. Thus we conclude that, in order to exclude these models, experiments measuring the global 21cm signal, such as EDGES and CORE, will need to reduce the systematics at 50 MHz to below 20 mK.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.