Paper detail

Signatures of anisotropic sources in the trispectrum of the cosmic microwave background

Soft limits of $N$-point correlation functions, in which one wavenumber is much smaller than the others, play a special role in constraining the physics of inflation. Anisotropic sources such as a vector field during inflation generate distinct angular dependence in all these correlators. In this paper we focus on the four-point correlator (the trispectrum $T$). We adopt a parametrization motivated by models in which the inflaton $ϕ$ is coupled to a vector field through a $I^2 \left( ϕ\right) F^2$ interaction, namely $T_ζ({\bf k}_1, {\bf k}_2, {\bf k}_3, {\bf k}_4) \equiv \sum_n d_n [ P_n(\hat{\bf k}_1 \cdot \hat{\bf k}_3) + P_n(\hat{\bf k}_1 \cdot \hat{\bf k}_{12}) + P_n(\hat{\bf k}_3 \cdot \hat{\bf k}_{12}) ] P_ζ(k_1) P_ζ(k_3) P_ζ(k_{12}) + (23~{\rm perm})$, where $P_n$ denotes the Legendre polynomials. This shape is enhanced when the wavenumbers of the diagonals of the quadrilateral are much smaller than the sides, ${\bf k}_i$. The coefficient of the isotropic part, $d_0$, is equal to $τ_{\rm NL}/6$ discussed in the literature. A $I^2 \left( ϕ\right) F^2$ interaction generates $d_2 = 2 d_0$ which is, in turn, related to the quadrupole modulation parameter of the power spectrum, $g_*$, as $d_2 \approx 14 |g_*| N^2$ with $N \approx 60$. We show that $d_0$ and $d_2$ can be equally well-constrained: the expected $68 \%$ CL error bars on these coefficients from a cosmic-variance-limited experiment measuring temperature anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background up to $\ell_{\rm max}=2000$ are $δd_2 \approx 4 δd_0 = 105$. Therefore, we can reach $|g_*|=10^{-3}$ by measuring the angle-dependent trispectrum. The current upper limit on $τ_{\rm NL}$ from the ${\it Planck}$ temperature maps yields $|g_*|<0.02$ ($95 \%$ CL).

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.