Paper detail

Signatures of anisotropic sources in the squeezed-limit bispectrum of the cosmic microwave background

The bispectrum of primordial curvature perturbations in the squeezed configuration, in which one wavenumber, $k_3$, is much smaller than the other two, $k_3\ll k_1\approx k_2$, plays a special role in constraining the physics of inflation. In this paper we study a new phenomenological signature in the squeezed-limit bispectrum: namely, the amplitude of the squeezed-limit bispectrum depends on an angle between ${\bf k}_1$ and ${\bf k}_3$ such that $B_ζ(k_1, k_2, k_3) \to 2 \sum_L c_L P_L(\hat{\bf k}_1 \cdot \hat{\bf k}_3) P_ζ(k_1)P_ζ(k_3)$, where $P_L$ are the Legendre polynomials. While $c_0$ is related to the usual local-form $f_{\rm NL}$ parameter as $c_0=6f_{\rm NL}/5$, the higher-multipole coefficients, $c_1$, $c_2$, etc., have not been constrained by the data. Primordial curvature perturbations sourced by large-scale magnetic fields generate non-vanishing $c_0$, $c_1$, and $c_2$. Inflation models whose action contains a term like $I(ϕ)^2 F^2$ generate $c_2=c_0/2$. A recently proposed "solid inflation" model generates $c_2\gg c_0$. A cosmic-variance-limited experiment measuring temperature anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background up to $\ell_{\rm max}=2000$ is able to measure these coefficients down to $δc_0=4.4$, $δc_1=61$, and $δc_2=13$ (68% CL). We also find that $c_0$ and $c_1$, and $c_0$ and $c_2$, are nearly uncorrelated. Measurements of these coefficients will open up a new window into the physics of inflation such as the existence of vector fields during inflation or non-trivial symmetry structure of inflaton fields. Finally, we show that the original form of the Suyama-Yamaguchi inequality does not apply to the case involving higher-spin fields, but a generalized form does.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.