Paper detail

Signature of gravitational radiation in afterglow of short Gamma-Ray Bursts?

Short Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs), brief intense emission of $γ-$rays characterized by a duration shorter than 2 seconds that are plausibly powered by the coalescence of binary neutron stars, are believed to be strong gravitational wave radiation (GWR) sources. The test of such a speculation has been thought to be impossible until the performance of the detectors like advanced LIGO. Recently there has been growing evidence for the formation of highly-magnetized neutron star (i.e., magnetar) in the double neutron star mergers. In this work we re-examine the interpretation of the X-ray plateau followed by an abrupt decline detected in some short GRB afterglows within the supramassive magnetar model and find that the maximum gravitational mass of the non-rotating neutron stars is $\sim 2.3M_{\odot}$ and the observed duration of some X-ray plateaus are significantly shorter than that expected in the magnetic dipole radiation scenario, suggesting that the collapse of the supramassive magnetars has been considerably enhanced by the energy loss via GWR. Such a result demonstrates that the signature of GWR may have already existed in current electromagnetic data of short GRBs.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.