Paper detail

Sign-Separated Finite-Time Error Analysis of Q-Learning

This paper develops a sign-separated finite-time error analysis for constant step-size Q-learning. Starting from the switching-system representation, the error is decomposed into its componentwise negative and positive parts. The negative part is dominated by a lower comparison linear time-invariant (LTI) system associated with a fixed optimal policy, whereas the positive part is controlled by a linear switching system. The resulting bounds show that the negative-side LTI certificate is no slower than the positive-side switching certificate and may produce a faster exponential envelope. The analysis identifies a max-induced asymmetry in Q-learning error dynamics. This asymmetry is connected to overestimation: positive action-wise errors can be selected and propagated by the Bellman maximum, whereas negative errors admit an optimal-policy lower comparison. Finite-time bounds are provided for both deterministic and stochastic constant-step-size recursions.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.