Paper detail

Shotgun edge assembly of random jigsaw puzzles

In recent work by Mossel and Ross, it was asked how large $q$ has to be for a random jigsaw puzzle with $q$ different shapes of "jigs" to have exactly one solution. The jigs are assumed symmetric in the sense that two jigs of the same type always fit together. They showed that for $q=o(n^{2/3})$ there are a.a.s. multiple solutions, and for $q=ω(n^2)$ there is a.a.s. exactly one. The latter bound has since been improved to $q\geq n^{1+\varepsilon}$ independently by Nenadov, Pfister and Steger, and by Bordernave, Feige and Mossel. Both groups further remark that for $q=o(n)$ there are a.a.s. duplicate pieces in the puzzle. In this paper, we show that such puzzle a.a.s. has multiple solutions whenever $q\leq \frac{2}{\sqrt{e}}\,n - ω(\log_2 n)$, even if permuting identical pieces is not considered changing the solution. We further give some remarks about the number of solutions, and the probability of a unique solution in this regime.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.