Paper detail

Short-Term Wind Speed Forecasting in Germany

The importance of renewable power production is a set goal in terms of the energy turnaround. Developing short-term wind speed forecasting improvements might increase the profitability of wind power. This article compares two novel approaches to model and predict wind speed. Both approaches incorporate periodic interactions, whereas the first model uses Fourier series to model the periodicity. The second model takes $l_{2,p}$ generalised trigonometric functions into consideration. The aforementioned Fourier series are special types of the p-generalised trigonometrical function and therefore model 1 is nested in model 2. The two models use an ARFIMA-APARCH process to cover the autocorrelation and the heteroscedasticity. A data set which consist of 10 minute data collected at four stations at the German-Polish border from August 2007 to December 2012 is analysed. The most important finding is an enhancement of the forecasting accuracy up to three hours that is directly related to our new short-term forecasting model.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.