Paper detail

Shock of three-state model for intracellular transport of kinesin KIF1A

Recently, a three-state model is presented to describe the intracellular traffic of unconventional (single-headed) kinesin KIF1A [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 95}, 118101 (2005)], in which each motor can bind strongly or weakly to its microtubule track, and each binding site of the track might be empty or occupied by one motor. As the usual two-state model, i.e. the totally asymmetric simple exclusion process (TASEP) with motor detachment and attachment, in steady state of the system, this three-state model also exhibits shock (or domain wall separating the high-density and low density phases) and boundary layers. In this study, using mean-field analysis, the conditions of existence of shock and boundary layers are obtained theoretically. Combined with numerical calculations, the properties of shock are also studied. This study will be helpful to understand the biophysical properties of the collective transport of kinesin KIF1A.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.