Paper detail

Shock Dissipation in Magnetically Dominated Impulsive Flows

We have revisited the issue of shock dissipation and emission and its implications for the internal shock model of the prompt GRB emission and studied it in the context of impulsive Poynting-dominated flows. Our results show that unless the magnetization of GRB jets is extremely high, σ> 100 in the prompt emission zone, the magnetic model may still be compatible with the observations. The main effect of reduced dissipation efficiency is merely an increase in the size of the dissipation zone and even for highly magnetised GRB jets this size may remain below the external shock radius, provided the central engine can emit magnetic shells on the time scale well below the typical observed variability scale of one second. Our analytical and numerical results suggest that magnetic shells begin strongly interact with each other well before they reach the coasting radius. As the result, the impulsive jet in the dissipation zone is best described not as a collection of shells but as a continuous highly magnetised flow with a high amplitude magnetosonic wave component. How exactly the dissipated wave energy is distributed between the radiation and the bulk kinetic energy of radial jets depends on the relative rates of radiative and adiabatic cooling. In the fast radiative cooling regime, the corresponding radiative efficiency can be as high as the wave contribution to their energy budget, independently of the magnetization. Moreover, after leaving the zone of prompt emission the jet may still remain Poynting-dominated, leading to weaker emission from the reverse shock compared to non-magnetic models.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.