Paper detail

Shining in the Dark: the Spectral Evolution of the First Black Holes

Massive Black Hole (MBH) seeds at redshift $z \gtrsim 10$ are now thought to be key ingredients to explain the presence of the super-massive ($10^{9-10} \, \mathrm{M_{\odot}}$) black holes in place $ < 1 \, \mathrm{Gyr}$ after the Big Bang. Once formed, massive seeds grow and emit copious amounts of radiation by accreting the left-over halo gas; their spectrum can then provide crucial information on their evolution. By combining radiation-hydrodynamic and spectral synthesis codes, we simulate the time-evolving spectrum emerging from the host halo of a MBH seed with initial mass $10^5 \, \mathrm{M_{\odot}}$, assuming both standard Eddington-limited accretion, or slim accretion disks, appropriate for super-Eddington flows. The emission occurs predominantly in the observed infrared-submm ($1-1000 \, \mathrm{μm}$) and X-ray ($0.1 - 100 \, \mathrm{keV}$) bands. Such signal should be easily detectable by JWST around $\sim 1 \, \mathrm{μm}$ up to $z \sim 25$, and by ATHENA (between $0.1$ and $10 \, \mathrm{keV}$, up to $z \sim 15$). Ultra-deep X-ray surveys like the Chandra Deep Field South could have already detected these systems up to $z \sim 15$. Based on this, we provide an upper limit for the $z \gtrsim 6$ MBH mass density of $ρ_{\bullet} \lesssim 2.5 \times 10^{2} \, \mathrm{M_{\odot} \, Mpc^{-3}}$ assuming standard Eddington-limited accretion. If accretion occurs in the slim disk mode the limits are much weaker, $ρ_{\bullet} \lesssim 7.6 \times 10^{3} \, \mathrm{M_{\odot} \, Mpc^{-3}}$ in the most constraining case.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.