Paper detail

Shifted Pruning for List Decoding of Polar Codes

In successive cancellation list (SCL) decoding, the tree pruning operation retains the L best paths with respect to metric at every decoding step. However, the correct path might be among the L worst paths due to imposed penalties. In this case, the correct path is pruned and the decoding process fails. In this work, we propose a scheme for additional decoding attempts when decoding fails, in which the pruning window does not necessarily select the L best paths, but this window is shifted between positions 1 and 2L in the sorted list. In the simplest form, the L worst paths are selected at the decoding step where the probability of elimination of the correct paths is high. Additionally, we generalize the scheme and propose a number of variants such as constrained shifting, nested shifting and shifting under segmented decoding, aiming to reduce the computational complexity. The numerical results for polar codes of length 512 with code rates 0.5 and 0.8 and list sizes L=2, 8, 32, show that the shifted-pruning scheme can provide 0.25-0.5 dB gain in error correction performance, while the average computational complexity approaches the conventional list decoding complexity at practical FER ranges.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.