Paper detail

Shift-preserving maps on $ω^*$

The shift map $σ$ on $ω^*$ is the continuous self-map of $ω^*$ induced by the function $n \mapsto n+1$ on $ω$. Given a compact Hausdorff space $X$ and a continuous function $f: X \rightarrow X$, we say that $(X,f)$ is a quotient of $(ω^*,σ)$ whenever there is a continuous surjection $Q: ω^* \to X$ such that $Q \circ σ= f \circ Q$. Our main theorem states that if the weight of $X$ is at most $\aleph_1$, then $(X,f)$ is a quotient of $(ω^*,σ)$ if and only if $f$ is weakly incompressible (which means that no nontrivial open $U \subseteq X$ has $f(\bar{U}) \subseteq U$). Under CH, this gives a complete characterization of the quotients of $(ω^*,σ)$ and implies, for example, that $(ω^*,σ^{-1})$ is a quotient of $(ω^*,σ)$. In the language of topological dynamics, our theorem states that a dynamical system of weight $\aleph_1$ is an abstract $ω$-limit set if and only if it is weakly incompressible. We complement these results by proving $(1)$ our main theorem remains true when $\aleph_1$ is replaced by any $κ< \mathfrak{p}$, $(2)$ consistently, the theorem becomes false if we replace $\aleph_1$ by $\aleph_2$, and $(3)$ OCA+MA implies that $(ω^*,σ^{-1})$ is not a quotient of $(ω^*,σ)$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.