Paper detail

Shellable drawings and the cylindrical crossing number of $K_n$

The Harary-Hill Conjecture States that the number of crossings in any drawing of the complete graph $ K_n $ in the plane is at least $Z(n):=\frac{1}{4}\left\lfloor \frac{n}{2}\right\rfloor \left\lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\right\rfloor \left\lfloor \frac{n-2}{2}\right\rfloor\left\lfloor \frac{n-3}{2}\right\rfloor$. In this paper, we settle the Harary-Hill conjecture for {\em shellable drawings}. We say that a drawing $D$ of $ K_n $ is {\em $ s $-shellable} if there exist a subset $ S = \{v_1,v_2,\ldots,v_ s\}$ of the vertices and a region $R$ of $D$ with the following property: For all $1 \leq i < j \leq s$, if $D_{ij}$ is the drawing obtained from $D$ by removing $v_1,v_2,\ldots v_{i-1},v_{j+1},\ldots,v_{s}$, then $v_i$ and $v_j$ are on the boundary of the region of $D_{ij}$ that contains $R$. For $ s\geq n/2 $, we prove that the number of crossings of any $ s $-shellable drawing of $ K_n $ is at least the long-conjectured value Z(n). Furthermore, we prove that all cylindrical, $ x $-bounded, monotone, and 2-page drawings of $ K_n $ are $ s $-shellable for some $ s\geq n/2 $ and thus they all have at least $ Z(n) $ crossings. The techniques developed provide a unified proof of the Harary-Hill conjecture for these classes of drawings.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.