Paper detail

Shedding Light on the Adoption of Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt is a new entrant in the Certificate Authority ecosystem that offers free and automated certificate signing. It is visionary in its commitment to Certificate Transparency. In this paper, we shed light on the adoption patterns of Let's Encrypt "in the wild" and inform the future design and deployment of this exciting development in the security landscape. We analyze acquisition patterns of certificates as well as their usage and deployment trends in the real world. To this end, we analyze data from Certificate Transparency Logs containing records of more then 18 million certificates. We also leverage other sources like Censys, Alexa's historic records, Geolocation databases, and VirusTotal. We also perform active HTTPS measurements on the domains owning Let's Encrypt certificates. Our analysis of certificate acquisition shows that (1) the impact of Let's Encrypt is particularly visible in Western Europe; (2) Let's Encrypt has the potential to democratize HTTPS adoption in countries that are recent entrants to Internet adoption; (3) there is anecdotal evidence of popular domains quitting their previously untrustworthy or expensive CAs in order to transition to Let's Encrypt; and (4) there is a "heavy tailed" behavior where a small number of domains acquire a large number of certificates. With respect to usage, we find that: (1) only 54% of domains actually use the Let's Encrypt certificates they have procured; (2) there are many non-trivial incidents of server misconfigurations; and (3) there is early evidence of use of Let's Encrypt certificates for typosquatting and for malware-laden sites.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.