Paper detail

Shashthosheba: Dissecting Perception of Bangladeshi People towards Telemedicine Apps through the Lens of Features of the Apps

Bangladesh, a developing country with a large and dense population, has recently seen significant economic as well as technological developments. The growth of technology has resulted in a dramatic increase in the number of smartphone users in Bangladesh, and as such, mobile apps have become an increasingly important part of peoples' life, even encompassing healthcare services. However, the apps used in healthcare (telemedicine to be specific) in Bangladesh are yet to be studied from the perspective of their features as per the voices of the users as well as service providers. Therefore, in this study, we focus on the features of the telemedicine apps used in Bangladesh. First, we evaluated the present status of existing telemedicine apps in Bangladesh, as well as their benefits and drawbacks in the context of HCI. We analyzed publicly accessible reviews of several Bangladeshi telemedicine apps (N = 14) to evaluate the user impressions. Additionally, to ascertain the public opinion of these apps, we performed a survey in which the patients (N = 87) participated willingly. Our analysis of the collected opinions reveals what users experience, what they appreciate, and what they are concerned about when they use telemedicine apps. Additionally, our study demonstrates what users expect from telemedicine apps, independent of their past experience. Finally, we explore how to address the issues we discovered and how telemedicine may be used to effectively offer healthcare services throughout the country. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to analyze the perception of the people of Bangladesh towards telemedicine apps from the perspective of features of the apps.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.