Paper detail

Sharpness of $C^0$ conjugacy for the non-autonomous differential equations with Lipschitzian perturbation

The classical $C^0$ linearization theorem for the non-autonomous differential equations states the existence of a $C^0$ topological conjugacy between the nonlinear system and its linear part. That is, there exists a homeomorphism (equivalent function) $H$ sending the solutions of the nonlinear system onto those of its linear part. It is proved in the previous literature that the equivalent function $H$ and its inverse $G=H^{-1}$ are both Hölder continuous if the nonlinear perturbation is Lipschitzian. Questions: is it possible to improve the regularity? Is the regularity sharp? To answer this question, we construct a counterexample to show that the equivalent function $H$ is exactly Lipschitzian, but the inverse $G=H^{-1}$ is merely Hölder continuous. Furthermore, we propose a conjecture that such regularity of the homeomorphisms is sharp (it could not be improved anymore). We prove that the conjecture is true for the systems with linear contraction. Furthermore, we present the special cases of linear perturbation, which are closely related to the spectrum.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.