Paper detail

Sharp upper and lower bounds on the number of spanning trees in Cartesian product of graphs

Let $G_1$ and $G_2$ be simple graphs and let $n_1 = |V(G_1)|$, $m_1 = |E(G_1)|$, $n_2 = |V(G_2)|$ and $m_2 = |E(G_2)|.$ In this paper we derive sharp upper and lower bounds for the number of spanning trees $τ$ in the Cartesian product $G_1 \square G_2$ of $G_1$ and $G_2$. We show that: $$ τ(G_1 \square G_2) \geq \frac{2^{(n_1-1)(n_2-1)}}{n_1n_2} (τ(G_1) n_1)^{\frac{n_2+1}{2}} (τ(G_2)n_2)^{\frac{n_1+1}{2}}$$ and $$τ(G_1 \square G_2) \leq τ(G_1)τ(G_2) [\frac{2m_1}{n_1-1} + \frac{2m_2}{n_2-1}]^{(n_1-1)(n_2-1)}.$$ We also characterize the graphs for which equality holds. As a by-product we derive a formula for the number of spanning trees in $K_{n_1} \square K_{n_2}$ which turns out to be $n_{1}^{n_1-2}n_2^{n_2-2}(n_1+n_2)^{(n_1-1)(n_2-1)}.$

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.