Paper detail

Sharp Stability Wavenumber-explicit Bounds for 2D Helmholtz Equations

Numerically solving the 2D Helmholtz equation is widely known to be very difficult largely due to its highly oscillatory solution, which brings about the pollution effect. A very fine mesh size is necessary to deal with a large wavenumber leading to a severely ill-conditioned huge coefficient matrix. To understand and tackle such challenges, it is crucial to analyze how the solution of the 2D Helmholtz equation depends on (perturbed) boundary and source data for large wavenumbers. In fact, this stability analysis is critical in the error analysis and development of effective numerical schemes. Therefore, in this paper, we analyze and derive several new sharp wavenumber-explicit stability bounds for the 2D Helmholtz equation with inhomogeneous mixed boundary conditions: Dirichlet, Neumann, and impedance. We use Fourier techniques, the Rellich's identity, and a lifting strategy to establish these stability bounds. Some examples are given to show the optimality of our derived wavenumber-explicit stability bounds.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.