Paper detail

Sharp MSE Bounds for Proximal Denoising

Denoising has to do with estimating a signal $x_0$ from its noisy observations $y=x_0+z$. In this paper, we focus on the "structured denoising problem", where the signal $x_0$ possesses a certain structure and $z$ has independent normally distributed entries with mean zero and variance $σ^2$. We employ a structure-inducing convex function $f(\cdot)$ and solve $\min_x\{\frac{1}{2}\|y-x\|_2^2+σλf(x)\}$ to estimate $x_0$, for some $λ>0$. Common choices for $f(\cdot)$ include the $\ell_1$ norm for sparse vectors, the $\ell_1-\ell_2$ norm for block-sparse signals and the nuclear norm for low-rank matrices. The metric we use to evaluate the performance of an estimate $x^*$ is the normalized mean-squared-error $\text{NMSE}(σ)=\frac{\mathbb{E}\|x^*-x_0\|_2^2}{σ^2}$. We show that NMSE is maximized as $σ\rightarrow 0$ and we find the \emph{exact} worst case NMSE, which has a simple geometric interpretation: the mean-squared-distance of a standard normal vector to the $λ$-scaled subdifferential $λ\partial f(x_0)$. When $λ$ is optimally tuned to minimize the worst-case NMSE, our results can be related to the constrained denoising problem $\min_{f(x)\leq f(x_0)}\{\|y-x\|_2\}$. The paper also connects these results to the generalized LASSO problem, in which, one solves $\min_{f(x)\leq f(x_0)}\{\|y-Ax\|_2\}$ to estimate $x_0$ from noisy linear observations $y=Ax_0+z$. We show that certain properties of the LASSO problem are closely related to the denoising problem. In particular, we characterize the normalized LASSO cost and show that it exhibits a "phase transition" as a function of number of observations. Our results are significant in two ways. First, we find a simple formula for the performance of a general convex estimator. Secondly, we establish a connection between the denoising and linear inverse problems.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.