Paper detail

Sharp local well-posedness for the "good" Boussinesq equation

In the present article, we prove the sharp local well-posedness and ill-posedness results for the "good" Boussinesq equation on $\mathbb{T}$; the initial value problem is locally well-posed in $H^{-1/2}(\mathbb{T})$ and ill-posed in $H^s(\mathbb{T})$ for $s<-1/2$. Well-posedness result is obtained from reduction of the problem into a quadratic nonlinear Schrödinger equation and the contraction argument in suitably modified $X^{s,b}$ spaces. The proof of the crucial bilinear estimates in these spaces, especially in the lowest regularity, rely on some bilinear estimates for one dimensional periodic functions in $X^{s,b}$ spaces, which are generalization of the bilinear refinement of the $L^4$ Strichartz estimate on $\mathbb{R}$. Our result improves the known local well-posedness in $H^s(\mathbb{T})$ with $s>-3/8$ given by Oh and Stefanov (2012) to the regularity threshold $H^{-1/2}(\mathbb{T})$. Similar ideas also establish the sharp local well-posedness in $H^{-1/2}(\mathbb{R})$ and ill-posedness below $H^{-1/2}$ for the nonperiodic case, which improves the result of Tsugawa and the author (2010) in $H^s(\mathbb{R})$ with $s>-1/2$ to the limiting regularity.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.