Paper detail

Shared Control Between Pilots and Autopilots: Illustration of a Cyber-Physical Human System

Although increased automation has made it easier to control aircraft, ensuring a safe interaction between the pilots and the autopilots is still a challenging problem, especially in the presence of severe anomalies. Current approach consists of autopilot solutions that disengage themselves when they become ineffective. This may cause reengagement of the pilot at the worst possible time, which can result in undesired consequences. In this paper, a series of research studies that propose pilot-autopilot interaction schemes based on the Capacity for Maneuver (CfM) concept, are covered. CfM refers to the remaining capacity of the actuators that can be used for bringing the aircraft to safety. It is demonstrated that CfM-based pilot-autopilot interaction schemes, or Shared Control Architectures (SCA), can be promising alternatives to the existing schemes. Two SCAs are tested in the experiments. In SCA1, the pilot takes over the control from the autopilot using the monitored CfM information. In SCA2, the pilot takes on the role of a supervisor helping the autopilot whenever a need arises, based on the CfM information. Whenever the aircraft experiences a severe anomaly, the pilot assesses the situation based on his/her CfM monitoring and intervenes by providing two control system parameter estimates to the autopilot. This increases the effectiveness of the autopilot. Using human-in-the-loop simulations, it is shown that CfM based interactions provides smaller tracking errors and larger overall CfM. The subjects including a commercial airline pilot and several university students are trained using a systematic procedure. Creation of new cyber physical & human systems is inevitable along with deeper engagement with the social science community so as to get better insight into human decision making. The results reported here should be viewed as a first of several steps in this research direction.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.