Paper detail

SHARDS: stellar populations and star formation histories of a mass-selected sample of 0.65<z<1.1 galaxies

We report on results from the analysis of a stellar mass-selected (log M*>9.0) sample of 1644 galaxies at 0.65<z<1.1 with ultra-deep (m<26.5) optical medium-band (R~50) photometry from the Survey for High-z Absorption Red and Dead Sources (SHARDS). The spectral resolution of SHARDS allows us to consistently measure the strength of the 4000 Angstrom spectral break [Dn(4000), an excellent age indicator for the stellar populations of quiescent galaxies] for all galaxies at z~0.9 down to log M*9. The Dn(4000) index cannot be resolved from broad-band photometry, and measurements from optical spectroscopic surveys are typically limited to galaxies at least x10 more massive. When combined with the rest-frame U-V colour, Dn(4000) provides a powerful diagnostic of the extinction affecting the stellar population that is relatively insensitive to degeneracies with age, metallicity or star formation history. We use this novel approach to estimate de-reddened colours and light-weighted stellar ages for individual sources. We explore the relationships linking stellar mass, (U-V), and Dn(4000) for the sources in the sample, and compare them to those found in local galaxies. The main results are: a) both Dn(4000) and (U-V) correlate with M*. The dispersion in Dn(4000) values at a given M* increases with M*, while the dispersion for (U-V) decreases due to the higher average extinction prevalent in massive star-forming galaxies. b) for massive galaxies, we find a smooth transition between the blue cloud and red sequence in the intrinsic U-V colour, in contrast with other recent results. c) at a fixed stellar age, we find a positive correlation between extinction and stellar mass. d) the fraction of sources with declining or halted star formation increases steeply with the stellar mass, from ~5% at log M*~9.0-9.5 to ~80% at log M*>11, in agreement with downsizing scenarios.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access13 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.