Shape, Thermal and Surface Properties determination of a Candidate Spacecraft Target Asteroid (175706) 1996 FG3

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Abstract

In this paper, a 3D convex shape model of (175706) 1996 FG3, which consists of 2040 triangle facets and 1022 vertices, is derived from the known lightcurves. The best-fit orientation of the asteroid's spin axis is determined to be λ=237.7∘λ=237.7^\circ and β=−83.8∘β=-83.8^{\circ} considering the observation uncertainties, and its rotation period is ∼\sim 3.5935 h . Using the derived shape model, we adopt the so-called advanced thermophysical model (ATPM) to fit three published sets of mid-infrared observations of 1996 FG3 \citep{Wolters2011,Walsh2012}, so as to evaluate its surface properties. Assuming the primary and the secondary bear identical shape, albedo, thermal inertia and surface roughness, the best-fit parameters are obtained from the observations. The geometric albedo and effective diameter of the asteroid are reckoned to be pv=0.045±0.002p_{\rm v}=0.045\pm0.002, Deff=1.69−0.02+0.05D_{\rm eff}=1.69^{+0.05}_{-0.02} km. The diameters of the primary and secondary are determined to be D1=1.63−0.03+0.04D_{1}=1.63^{+0.04}_{-0.03} km and D2=0.45−0.03+0.04D_{2}=0.45^{+0.04}_{-0.03} km, respectively. The surface thermal inertia ΓΓ is derived to be a low value of 80±40Jm−2s−0.5K−180\pm40\rm Jm^{-2}s^{-0.5}K^{-1} with a roughness fraction fRf_{\rm R} of 0.8−0.4+0.20.8^{+0.2}_{-0.4}. This indicates that the primary possibly has a regolith layer on its surface, which is likely to be covered by a mixture of dust, fragmentary rocky debris and sand. The minimum regolith depth is estimated to be 5∼20mm5\sim20\rm mm from the simulations of subsurface temperature distribution, indicating that 1996 FG3 could be a very suitable target for a sample return mission.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.