Paper detail

Shape induced segregation and anomalous particle transport under spherical confinement

Colloid or nanoparticle mobility under confinement is of central importance to a wide range of physical and biological processes. Here, we introduce a minimal model of particles in a hydrodynamic continuum to examine how particle shape and concentration affect the transport of particles in spherical confinement. Specifically, an immersed boundary-General geometry Ewald-like approach is adopted to simulate the dynamics of spheres and cylinders under the influence of short-and long-range fluctuating hydrodynamic interactions with appropriate non-slip conditions at the confining walls. An efficient $\it{O(N)}$ parallel finite element algorithm is used, thereby allowing simulations at high concentrations, while a Chebyshev polynomial approximation is implemented in order to satisfy the fluctuation-dissipation theorem. A concentration-dependent anomalous diffusion is observed for suspended particles. It is found that introducing cylinders in a background of spheres, i.e. particles with a simple degree of anisotropy, has a pronounced influence on the structure and dynamics of the particles. First, increasing the fraction of cylinders induces a particle segregation effect, where spheres are pushed towards the wall and cylinders remain near the center of the cavity. This segregation leads to lower mobility for the spheres relative to that encountered in a system of pure spheres at the same volume fraction. Second, the diffusive-to-anomalous transition and the degree of anomaly--quantified by the power-law exponent in the mean square displacement vs. time relation-both increase as the fraction of cylinders becomes larger. These findings are of relevance for studies of diffusion in the cytoplasm, where proteins exhibit a distribution of size and shapes that could lead to some of the effects identified in the simulations reported here.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.