Paper detail

Shape and motion of drops in the inertial regime

In this paper, we report experimental results on the shape and motion of a mercury droplet, placed in a horizontally rotating cylinder in the rpm range 8-93, so that the Reynolds number of the drop 2500<Re<26000 and its capillary number 0.0002<Ca<0.0023. When contact angle variations can be neglected at low speeds (Re<8150), the velocity of the drop is much lower than that predicted by the Ho. Young Kim's [6] relation. This observed discrepancy is overcome by modifying Kim's relation by substituting the dissipation estimated from a boundary layer near the solid surface instead of bulk dissipation. Based on the changes at the rear side of the mercury droplet, there are three distinct regimes identified with varying speeds of rotation (i) oval or rounded regime (ii) corner regime and (iii) cusping regime. The oval to corner transition happens at a finite receding contact angle of 950. The ratio of critical contact angle (θc) at which the transition occurs to the static receding contact angle (θs) was found to be 0.657. The de Gennes model [4], extended to high contact angle by substituting the dissipation for wedge flow, predicts a critical contact angle ratio (θc/θs) that is in close agreement with the experimental value. At higher Re, the dynamic contact angle variation with velocity was compared with Cox-Voinov model [3]. Though the trend of the variation of data is approximately represented by the model, the fit coefficient according to experimental data is very high when compared to theoretical value.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.