Paper detail

SFXTs as best candidate counterparts of unidentified transient MeV-GeV sources: the test case of IGR J17354-3255/AGL J1734-3310

In the last few years Fermi and AGILE observations have indicated the existence of a possible population of transient MeV-GeV sources located on the Galactic plane and characterized by fast flares lasting only a very few days. Notably, no blazar-like counterparts are known within their error boxes so they could represent a completely new class of Galactic transient high energy emitters. The task of identifying their counterparts at lower energies remains very challenging. Despite this difficulty, INTEGRAL observations have provided intriguing hints that reliable candidate counterparts for these unidentified MeV-GeV transients could be found among the members of the recently discovered class of Supergiant Fast X-ray Transients (SFXTs). In this context, to date the best test case is represented by the association between the two sources IGR J17354-3255 and AGL J1734-3310. We will discuss their possible physical link and implications stemming from this association.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.