Paper detail

Series of Tests of a Constraint on Asymptotically Free Gauge Theories

In 1999 Thomas Appelquist, Andrew G. Cohen, and Martin Schmaltz (ACS) proposed a constraint on the structure of asymptotically-free field theories. This constraint limits the number of degrees of freedom of asymptotically-free gauge theories in the infrared ($IR$) region relative to those in the ultra-violet ($UV$) region. In their paper ACS checked various examples, both supersymmetric and non-supersymmetric, but checked only one case of interacting $IR$ fixed point with superpotential - the case of Seiberg-dual of $SU(N_{c})$ gauge theory. Here we will verify the conjecture for two new cases - $SO(N_{c})$ and $Sp(2N_{c})$ gauge groups around the Banks-Zaks fixed points. In addition, we subject the ACS inequality to a series of nontrivial tests in theories with conjectured accidental symmetries in the $IR$ and dramatically different dynamics caused by superpotential deformations. We start with $ADE$-type deformations then move on to check three chiral theories by estimating their decoupled invariants from the chiral ring using a-maximization and unitarity considerations. Remarkably, we found no violation of the ACS conjecture.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.