Paper detail

Sequential and Decentralized Estimation of Linear Regression Parameters in Wireless Sensor Networks

Sequential estimation of a vector of linear regression coefficients is considered under both centralized and decentralized setups. In sequential estimation, the number of observations used for estimation is determined by the observed samples, hence is random, as opposed to fixed-sample-size estimation. Specifically, after receiving a new sample, if a target accuracy level is reached, we stop and estimate using the samples collected so far; otherwise we continue to receive another sample. It is known that finding an optimum sequential estimator, which minimizes the average sample number for a given target accuracy level, is an intractable problem with a general stopping rule that depends on the complete observation history. By properly restricting the search space to stopping rules that depend on a specific subset of the complete observation history, we derive the optimum sequential estimator in the centralized case via optimal stopping theory. However, finding the optimum stopping rule in this case requires numerical computations that {\em quadratically} scales with the number of parameters to be estimated. For the decentralized setup with stringent energy constraints, under an alternative problem formulation that is conditional on the observed regressors, we first derive a simple optimum scheme whose computational complexity is {\em constant} with respect to the number of parameters. Then, following this simple optimum scheme we propose a decentralized sequential estimator whose computational complexity and energy consumption scales {\em linearly} with the number of parameters. Specifically, in the proposed decentralized scheme a close-to-optimum average stopping time performance is achieved by infrequently transmitting a single pulse with very short duration.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors6 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.