Paper detail

Sequences of compatible periodic hybrid orbits of prefractal Koch snowflake billiards

The Koch snowflake KS is a nowhere differentiable curve. The billiard table Omega(KS) with boundary KS is, a priori, not well defined. That is, one cannot a priori determine the minimal path traversed by a billiard ball subject to a collision in the boundary of the table. It is this problem which makes Omega(KS) such an interesting, yet difficult, table to analyze. In this paper, we approach this problem by approximating (from the inside) Omega(KS) by well-defined (prefractal) rational polygonal billiard tables Omega(KS_n). We first show that the flat surface S(KS_n) determined from the rational billiard Omega(KS_n) is a branched cover of the singly punctured hexagonal torus. Such a result, when combined with the results of [Gut2], allows us to define a sequence of compatible orbits of prefractal billiards. We define a hybrid orbit of a prefractal billiard Omega(KS_n) and show that every dense orbit of a prefractal billiard is a dense hybrid orbit of Omega(KS_n). This result is key in obtaining a topological dichotomy for a sequence of compatible orbits. Furthermore, we determine a sufficient condition for a sequence of compatible orbits to be a sequence of compatible periodic hybrid orbits. We then examine the limiting behavior of a sequence of compatible periodic hybrid orbits. We show that the trivial limit of particular (eventually) constant sequences of compatible hybrid orbits constitutes an orbit of Omega(KS). In addition, we show that the union of two suitably chosen nontrivial polygonal paths connects two elusive limit points of the Koch snowflake. Finally, we discuss how it may be possible for our results to be generalized to other fractal billiard tables and how understanding the structures of the Veech groups of the prefractal billiards may help in determining `fractal flat surfaces' naturally associated with the billiard flows.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.