Paper detail

Sequence assembly from corrupted shotgun reads

The prevalent technique for DNA sequencing consists of two main steps: shotgun sequencing, where many randomly located fragments, called reads, are extracted from the overall sequence, followed by an assembly algorithm that aims to reconstruct the original sequence. There are many different technologies that generate the reads: widely-used second-generation methods create short reads with low error rates, while emerging third-generation methods create long reads with high error rates. Both error rates and error profiles differ among methods, so reconstruction algorithms are often tailored to specific shotgun sequencing technologies. As these methods change over time, a fundamental question is whether there exist reconstruction algorithms which are robust, i.e., which perform well under a wide range of error distributions. Here we study this question of sequence assembly from corrupted reads. We make no assumption on the types of errors in the reads, but only assume a bound on their magnitude. More precisely, for each read we assume that instead of receiving the true read with no errors, we receive a corrupted read which has edit distance at most $ε$ times the length of the read from the true read. We show that if the reads are long enough and there are sufficiently many of them, then approximate reconstruction is possible: we construct a simple algorithm such that for almost all original sequences the output of the algorithm is a sequence whose edit distance from the original one is at most $O(ε)$ times the length of the original sequence.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.