Paper detail

Separating Semantic Expansion from Linear Geometry for PubMed-Scale Vector Search

We describe a PubMed scale retrieval framework that separates semantic interpretation from metric geometry. A large language model expands a natural language query into concise biomedical phrases; retrieval then operates in a fixed, mean free, approximately isotropic embedding space. Each document and query vector is formed as a weighted mean of token embeddings, projected onto the complement of nuisance axes and compressed by a Johnson Lindenstrauss transform. No parameters are trained. The system retrieves coherent biomedical clusters across the full MEDLINE corpus (about 40 million records) using exact cosine search on 256 dimensional int8 vectors. Evaluation is purely geometric: head cosine, compactness, centroid closure, and isotropy are compared with random vector baselines. Recall is not defined, since the language-model expansion specifies the effective target set.

preprint2025arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.