Paper detail

Separating hash families: A Johnson-type bound and new constructions

Separating hash families are useful combinatorial structures which are generalizations of many well-studied objects in combinatorics, cryptography and coding theory. In this paper, using tools from graph theory and additive number theory, we solve several open problems and conjectures concerning bounds and constructions for separating hash families. Firstly, we discover that the cardinality of a separating hash family satisfies a Johnson-type inequality. As a result, we obtain a new upper bound, which is superior to all previous ones. Secondly, we present a construction for an infinite class of perfect hash families. It is based on the Hamming graphs in coding theory and generalizes many constructions that appeared before. It provides an affirmative answer to both Bazrafshan-Trung's open problem on separating hash families and Alon-Stav's conjecture on parent-identifying codes. Thirdly, let $p_t(N,q)$ denote the maximal cardinality of a $t$-perfect hash family of length $N$ over an alphabet of size $q$. Walker II and Colbourn conjectured that $p_3(3,q)=o(q^2)$. We verify this conjecture by proving $q^{2-o(1)}<p_3(3,q)=o(q^2)$. Our proof can be viewed as an application of Ruzsa-Szemer{é}di's (6,3)-theorem. We also prove $q^{2-o(1)}<p_4(4,q)=o(q^2)$. Two new notions in graph theory and additive number theory, namely rainbow cycles and $R$-sum-free sets, are introduced to prove this result. These two bounds support a question of Blackburn, Etzion, Stinson and Zaverucha. Finally, we establish a bridge between perfect hash families and hypergraph Tur{á}n problems. This connection has not been noticed before. As a consequence, many new results and problems arise.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.