Paper detail

Separating Content from Speaker Identity in Speech for the Assessment of Cognitive Impairments

Deep speaker embeddings have been shown effective for assessing cognitive impairments aside from their original purpose of speaker verification. However, the research found that speaker embeddings encode speaker identity and an array of information, including speaker demographics, such as sex and age, and speech contents to an extent, which are known confounders in the assessment of cognitive impairments. In this paper, we hypothesize that content information separated from speaker identity using a framework for voice conversion is more effective for assessing cognitive impairments and train simple classifiers for the comparative analysis on the DementiaBank Pitt Corpus. Our results show that while content embeddings have an advantage over speaker embeddings for the defined problem, further experiments show their effectiveness depends on information encoded in speaker embeddings due to the inherent design of the architecture used for extracting contents.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.