Paper detail

Separating Accretion and Mergers in the Cosmic Growth of Black Holes with X-ray and Gravitational Wave Observations

Black holes across a broad range of masses play a key role in the evolution of galaxies. The initial seeds of black holes formed at $z \sim 30$ and grew over cosmic time by gas accretion and mergers. Using observational data for quasars and theoretical models for the hierarchical assembly of dark matter halos, we study the relative importance of gas accretion and mergers for black hole growth, as a function of redshift ($0<z<10$) and black hole mass ($ 10^3 \, \mathrm{M_{\odot}} < M_{\bullet} < 10^{10} \, \mathrm{M_{\odot}}$). We find that (i) growth by accretion is dominant in a large fraction of the parameter space, especially at $M_{\bullet} > 10^8 \, \mathrm{M_{\odot}}$ and $z>6$; and (ii) growth by mergers is dominant at $M_{\bullet} < 10^5 \, \mathrm{M_{\odot}}$ and $z>5.5$, and at $M_{\bullet} > 10^8 \, \mathrm{M_{\odot}}$ and $z<2$. As the growth channel has direct implications for the black hole spin (with gas accretion leading to higher spin values), we test our model against $\sim 20$ robust spin measurements available thus far. As expected, the spin tends to decline toward the merger-dominated regime, thereby supporting our model. The next generation of X-ray and gravitational-wave observatories (e.g. Lynx, AXIS, Athena and LISA) will map out populations of black holes up to very high redshift ($z\sim 20)$, covering the parameter space investigated here in almost its entirety. Their data will be instrumental to providing a clear picture of how black holes grew across cosmic time.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.