Paper detail

Separability criteria with angular and Hilbert space averages

The practically useful criteria of separable states $ρ=\sum_{k}w_{k}ρ_{k}$ in $d=2\times2$ are discussed. The equality $G({\bf a},{\bf b})= 4[\langle ψ|P({\bf a})\otimes P({\bf b})|ψ\rangle-\langle ψ|P({\bf a})\otimes{\bf 1}|ψ\rangle\langle ψ|{\bf 1}\otimes P({\bf b})|ψ\rangle]=0$ for any two projection operators $P({\bf a})$ and $P({\bf b})$ provides a necessary and sufficient separability criterion in the case of a separable pure state $ρ=|ψ\rangle\langleψ|$. We propose the separability criteria of mixed states, which are given by ${\rm Tr}ρ\{{\bf a}\cdot {\bf σ}\otimes {\bf b}\cdot {\bf σ}\}=(1/3)C\cosφ$ for two spin $1/2$ systems and $4{\rm Tr}ρ\{P({\bf a})\otimes P({\bf b})\}=1+(1/2)C\cos2φ$ for two photon systems, respectively, after taking a geometrical angular average of ${\bf a}$ and ${\bf b}$ with fixed $\cosφ={\bf a}\cdot{\bf b}$. Here $-1\leq C\leq 1$, and the difference in the numerical coefficients $1/2$ and $1/3$ arises from the different rotational properties of the spinor and the transverse photon. If one instead takes an average over the states in the $d=2$ Hilbert space, the criterion for two photon systems is replaced by $4{\rm Tr}ρ\{P({\bf a})\otimes P({\bf b})\}=1+(1/3)C\cos2φ$. Those separability criteria are shown to be very efficient using the existing experimental data of Aspect et al. in 1981 and Sakai et al. in 2006. When the Werner state is applied to two photon systems, it is shown that the Hilbert space average can judge its inseparability but not the geometrical angular average.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.