Paper detail

Sensitivity of the Magnetorotational Instability to the shear parameter in stratified simulations

The magnetorotational instability (MRI) is a shear instability and thus its sensitivity to the shear parameter $q = - d\lnΩ/d\ln r $ is of interest to investigate. Motivated by astrophysical disks, most (but not all) previous MRI studies have focused on the Keplerian value of $ q=1.5$. Using simulation with 8 vertical density scale heights, we contribute to the subset of studies addressing the the effect of varying $q$ in stratified numerical simulations. We discuss why shearing boxes cannot easily be used to study $q>2$ and thus focus on $q<2$. As per previous simulations, which were either unstratified or stratified with a smaller vertical domain, we find that the $q$ dependence of stress for the stratified case is not linear, contrary to the Shakura-Sunyaev model. We find that the scaling agrees with \cite{1996MNRAS.281L..21A} who found it to be proportional to the shear to vorticity ratio $q/(2-q)$. We also find however, that the shape of the magnetic and kinetic energy spectra are relatively insensitive to $q$ and that the ratio of Maxwell stress to magnetic energy ratio also remains nearly independent of $q$. This is consistent with a theoretical argument in which the rate of amplification of the azimuthal field depends linearly on $q$ and the turbulent correlation time $τ$ depends inversely on $q$. As such, we measure the correlation time of the turbulence and find that indeed it is inversely proportional to $q$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.