Paper detail

Sensitivity of ${^{44}}$Ti and ${^{56}}$Ni production in CCSN shock-driven nucleosynthesis to reaction rates

Recent observational advances have enabled high resolution mapping of ${^{44}}$Ti in core-collapse supernova (CCSN) remnants. Comparisons between observations and models provide stringent constraints on the CCSN mechanism. However, past work has identified several uncertain nuclear reaction rates that influence ${^{44}}$Ti and ${^{56}}$Ni production in post-processing model calculations. We evolved one dimensional models of $15~M_{\odot}$, $18~M_{\odot}$, $22~M_{\odot}$ and $25~M_{\odot}$ stars from zero-age main sequence through CCSN using {\tt MESA} (Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics) and investigated the previously identified reaction rate sensitivities of ${^{44}}$Ti and ${^{56}}$Ni production. We tested the robustness of our results by making various assumptions about the CCSN explosion energy and mass-cut. We found a number of reactions that have a significant impact on the nucleosynthesis of ${^{44}}$Ti and ${^{56}}$Ni, particularly for lower progenitor masses. Notably, the reaction rates $^{13}{\rm N}(α,p)^{16}{\rm O}$, $^{17}{\rm F}(α,p)^{20}{\rm Ne}$, $^{52}{\rm Fe}(α,p)^{55}{\rm Co}$, $^{56}{\rm Ni}(α,p)^{59}{\rm Cu}$, $^{57}{\rm Ni}(n,p)^{57}{\rm Co}$, $^{56}{\rm Co}(p,n)^{56}{\rm Ni}$, $^{39}{\rm K}(p,γ)^{40}{\rm Ca}$, $^{47}{\rm V}(p,γ)^{48}{\rm Cr}$, $^{52}{\rm Mn}(p,γ)^{53}{\rm Fe}$, $^{57}{\rm Co}(p,γ)^{58}{\rm Ni}$, and $^{39}{\rm K}(p,α)^{36}{\rm Ar}$ are influential for a large number of model conditions. Furthermore, we found the list of influential reactions identified by previous post-processing studies of CCSN shock-driven nucleosynthesis is likely incomplete, motivating future larger-scale sensitivity studies.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.