Paper detail

Semileptonic B decay as a test of CKM unitarity

I point out that $B \to X_q ł^+ ł^-$ decays $(q = s, d)$ are sensitive probes of possible violation of CKM unitarity. I compute the decay rates and asymmetries in a minimal extension of the Standard Model containing an additional isosinglet charge (-1/3) quark, which leads to a deviation from CKM unitarity. It is shown that even for small mixing ratios $|{z_{qb}}/{(V_{tq}^\ast V_{tb})}| \sim O({10}^{-2})$, the contribution of the tree-level $Z-$FCNC appearing in the model should change the rates and asymmetries significantly. Especially the CP asymmetry, $A_{CP} (B \to X_s ł^+ ł^-)$, can be enhanced to be few percents, while in the standard model the size is less than $O({10}^{-3})$. On the other hand, $A_{CP} (B \to X_d ł^+ ł^-)$ is not altered so much. Constraints for the mixing ratios are extracted from the experiments of $B \to X_s γ$ for $q = s$ and $B_d^0 - \bar{B}_d^0$ mixing for $q = d$ under a natural assumption that the couplings of the tree-level $Zf\bar{f}$ are almost unity, i.e. $z_{αα} \sim 1$.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.