Paper detail

Semi-online Scheduling: A Survey

In online scheduling, jobs are available one by one and each job must be scheduled irrevocably before the availability of the next job. Semi-online scheduling is a relaxed variant of online scheduling, where an additional memory in terms of buffer or an Extra Piece of Information(EPI) is provided along with input data. The EPI may include one or more of the parameter(s) such as size of the largest job, total size of all jobs, arrival sequence of the jobs, optimum makespan value or range of job's processing time. A semi-online scheduling algorithm was first introduced in 1997 by Kellerer et al. They envisioned semi-online scheduling as a practically significant model and obtained improved results for $2$-identical machine setting. This paper surveys scholarly contributions in the design of semi-online scheduling algorithms in parallel machine models such as identical and uniformly related by considering job's processing formats such as preemptive and non-preemptive with the optimality criteria such as Min-Max and Max-Min. The main focus is to present state of the art competitive analysis results of well-known semi-online scheduling algorithms in a chronological overview. The survey first introduces the online and semi-online algorithmic frameworks for the multi-processor scheduling problem with important applications and research motivation, followed by a taxonomy for semi-online scheduling. Fifteen well-known semi-online scheduling algorithms are stated. Important competitive analysis results are presented in a chronological way by highlighting the critical ideas and intuition behind the results. An evolution time-line of semi-online scheduling setups and a classification of the references based on EPI are outlined. Finally, the survey concludes with the exploration of some of the interesting research challenges and open problems.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.