Semi-Clifford operations, structure of Ck\mathcal{C}_k hierarchy, and gate complexity for fault-tolerant quantum computation

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Abstract

Teleportation is a crucial element in fault-tolerant quantum computation and a complete understanding of its capacity is very important for the practical implementation of optimal fault-tolerant architectures. It is known that stabilizer codes support a natural set of gates that can be more easily implemented by teleportation than any other gates. These gates belong to the so called Ck\mathcal{C}_k hierarchy introduced by Gottesman and Chuang (Nature \textbf{402}, 390). Moreover, a subset of Ck\mathcal{C}_k gates, called semi-Clifford operations, can be implemented by an even simpler architecture than the traditional teleportation setup (Phys. Rev. \textbf{A62}, 052316). However, the precise set of gates in Ck\mathcal{C}_k remains unknown, even for a fixed number of qubits nn, which prevents us from knowing exactly what teleportation is capable of. In this paper we study the structure of Ck\mathcal{C}_k in terms of semi-Clifford operations, which send by conjugation at least one maximal abelian subgroup of the nn-qubit Pauli group into another one. We show that for n=1,2n=1,2, all the Ck\mathcal{C}_k gates are semi-Clifford, which is also true for {n=3,k=3}\{n=3,k=3\}. However, this is no longer true for {n>2,k>3}\{n>2,k>3\}. To measure the capability of this teleportation primitive, we introduce a quantity called `teleportation depth', which characterizes how many teleportation steps are necessary, on average, to implement a given gate. We calculate upper bounds for teleportation depth by decomposing gates into both semi-Clifford Ck\mathcal{C}_k gates and those Ck\mathcal{C}_k gates beyond semi-Clifford operations, and compare their efficiency.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.