Paper detail

Semi-Clifford operations, structure of $\mathcal{C}_k$ hierarchy, and gate complexity for fault-tolerant quantum computation

Teleportation is a crucial element in fault-tolerant quantum computation and a complete understanding of its capacity is very important for the practical implementation of optimal fault-tolerant architectures. It is known that stabilizer codes support a natural set of gates that can be more easily implemented by teleportation than any other gates. These gates belong to the so called $\mathcal{C}_k$ hierarchy introduced by Gottesman and Chuang (Nature \textbf{402}, 390). Moreover, a subset of $\mathcal{C}_k$ gates, called semi-Clifford operations, can be implemented by an even simpler architecture than the traditional teleportation setup (Phys. Rev. \textbf{A62}, 052316). However, the precise set of gates in $\mathcal{C}_k$ remains unknown, even for a fixed number of qubits $n$, which prevents us from knowing exactly what teleportation is capable of. In this paper we study the structure of $\mathcal{C}_k$ in terms of semi-Clifford operations, which send by conjugation at least one maximal abelian subgroup of the $n$-qubit Pauli group into another one. We show that for $n=1,2$, all the $\mathcal{C}_k$ gates are semi-Clifford, which is also true for $\{n=3,k=3\}$. However, this is no longer true for $\{n>2,k>3\}$. To measure the capability of this teleportation primitive, we introduce a quantity called `teleportation depth', which characterizes how many teleportation steps are necessary, on average, to implement a given gate. We calculate upper bounds for teleportation depth by decomposing gates into both semi-Clifford $\mathcal{C}_k$ gates and those $\mathcal{C}_k$ gates beyond semi-Clifford operations, and compare their efficiency.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.