Paper detail

Semi-classical treatment of $k$-essence effect on cosmic temperature

A phenomenological model is described for Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) evolution with dark energy an essential ingredient in the form of a $k-$essence scalar field. The following features of this evolution can be successfully obtained from this model: (a) the {\it observed} variation of the rate of change of scale factor $a(t)$, i.e. $\dot a$, with time and (b) the {\it observed} value of the epoch when the universe went from a decelerating phase to an accelerated phase. These two features have been matched with graphical transcriptions of SNe Ia data. The model also indicates that the evolution is sensitive to the presence of inhomogeneity and this sensitivity increases as one goes further into the past. Further, the value of the inhomogeneity parameter determines the epoch of switch over to an accelerated phase. A positive value of inhomogeneity parameter leads to switch over at earlier epochs, while a negative value leads to switch over at later epochs. If the value of the inhomogeneity parameter is a bit negative then the crossover point from deceleration to acceleration gives better agreement with the observed value.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.